<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Virginia Miracle &#187; Avner Ronen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.virginiamiracle.com/tag/avner-ronen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.virginiamiracle.com</link>
	<description>Word of Mouth Marketing Practitioner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4 Takeaways from SXSW 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.virginiamiracle.com/2010/03/16/4-takeaways-from-sxsw-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.virginiamiracle.com/2010/03/16/4-takeaways-from-sxsw-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>virginia.miracle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avner Ronen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Cuban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QR Codes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ze Frank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.virginiamiracle.com/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year’s SXSWi was a cacophony of parties, cowboy hatted street teams and networking with a few panels and prepared speakers tucked in between. My extreme desire to sift logic from chaos and the peace of a few hours of distance has left me mulling the following 4 takeaways: Content Creators Must Get Paid – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year’s SXSWi was a cacophony of parties,  cowboy hatted street teams and networking with a few panels and prepared  speakers tucked in between. My extreme desire to sift  logic from chaos and the peace of a few hours of distance has left me  mulling the following 4 takeaways:</p>
<p><strong>Content Creators Must Get Paid</strong> – If you  braved the distraction of a fire alarm and came back into the building,  you were privy to an educated man’s verbal smackdown the likes of which I  had not previously seen in public – Marc Cuban vs. <a title="Boxee" href="http://www.boxee.tv/" target="_blank">Boxee</a>’s Avner Ronen. Cuban  artfully beat the drum that pay tv is going to continue to dominate (and  that cash is king –  jabbing at Boxee’s “revenue free” model again and  again). Avner had a bit of a “home audience” advantage  being surrounded by self-admitted geeks who don’t like paying for  anything. But if stolen internet content wins – who will  pay for great content to still be created? TV shows do not  have the same tour-for-cash out that music artists have used to weather  the a la carte iTunes model. Later speaker Ze Frank also  mused this same dilemma – being unable to monetize his awesome web  content, but unable to break into the Hollywood revenue model in a  meaningful way. I have no idea what the future holds, but  someone needs to get paid or the only shows being made will be for the  least common denominator.</p>
<p><strong>Publicizing Public Information is a Violation of  Privacy</strong> – If you followed the tweetstream from Austin this weekend,  you probably saw that the most substantive traffic from any session  seemed to come from the very meaty presentation from MSFT-based social  network researcher danah boyd (<a title="danah boyd" href="http://twitter.com/zephoria" target="_blank">@zephoria</a>).  This is a talk that will be worth watching in its entirety (<a title="danah boyd's SXSW talk" href="http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/2010/SXSW2010.html" target="_blank">read the transcript here</a>), but if I was struck by  one takeaway it is the difference between “public” information –  information that can be obtained in some way – and information that we  want publicized. danah boyd strongly believes that taking  something that someone has written on a public site – say a forum about  travel – and using it an ad or republishing it on an aggregator – is a  violation of the author’s privacy because it violates the social norms  and reasonable assumptions under which the author originally shared.  It was a great reminder to begin all digital strategies with the  purpose of adding value to all audiences – readers and content creators  alike.</p>
<p><strong><a title="QR Codes" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QR_Code" target="_blank">QR Codes</a> are Coming </strong>– Previously categorized as “big in Asia”, <a title="QR  Codes" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-20000513-52.html" target="_blank">SXSW badges boasted QR codes</a> that, with the addition  of an “app for that”, allowed users to share their information with the  capture of an encoded 2D barcode. The advent of this  technology is just another reason to think about danahboyd’s talk and  what you decide to keep private, public, or publicize in social media.</p>
<p><strong>Geolocation is a Foregone Conclusion</strong> – While  pre-SXSW discussion seemed to be  dominated by “geolocation  is the new Twitter” discussion, by the time we got to the event, it was  simply accepted as a  given and everyone was on to the next topic.  The only discussion I did hear was a bit of debate between   hometown fave <a title="Gowalla" href="http://gowalla.com/" target="_blank">Gowalla</a> and <a title="Foursquare" href="http://foursquare.com" target="_blank">Foursquare</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.virginiamiracle.com/2010/03/16/4-takeaways-from-sxsw-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

